Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Please confirm you want to mark all posts read

Mark all topics read

sp_MobileMenu Actions
Avatar
Guest
Not logged in

New/Updated Topics

Select Forum

sp_TopicIcon
Sails...Absorption or Diffusion?
Avatar
New Zealand
Posts: 3
July 25, 2016 - 12:12 am

1

Many high-end studio's I have had to pleasure to be in (Neil Finn of Crowded house fame's Roundhead Studio's and York Street, designed and started by Jaz Coleman of Killing Joke to name to as an example) have had a mix of diffusion strategically placed on the ceiling with diffusion rather than absorption often above the mix position,what are the pro's and con's of this application,and what would the usage/desired result be when placing these technologies .

Avatar
Posts: 389
July 29, 2016 - 3:51 pm
2

Hi Hayden,

Diffusion is a good ceiling treatment option if you have distance for all wave forms to fully form prior to reaching the monitoring position. Absorption is not so distance dependent. Diffusion is also much more expensive running around 4-5 times more than absorption . Personally, I prefer diffusion.

Forum Timezone:
America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 31
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 3
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Devices in use: Desktop (2), Phone (1)

Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 10
Topics: 376
Posts: 1024
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 23
Members: 14816
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2