Evaluating audio quality from the latest field test can be tricky business. At time higher sample rates can be an asset at other times a detriment. Around 1983 digital audio formats entered the consumer format with the 16-bit/44.1kHZ standard. While some purists still claim analog is more enjoyable, advances in technology give today’s laptops higher recording precision that those early converters. With this better equipment some designers are doubling the kHZ of the sample, but it is yet to be proven whether the product is better.
Read the full article here:
Are higher sampling rates always better? Justin Colletti tells us when.
We use broadband absorption in the two most critical frequency regions in small rooms. Our Diaphragmatic absorbers, ACDA series, have…
Interesting web site and provocative introduction. Please check your copy for typos, otherwise nicely presented. I would like to see…
There is no such thing as soundproof anything especially carpet. Low frequency noise transmission requires a permanent construction fix with…
Hello Dennis! Our neighbors put a Ice Bath in their garage which is right below our bedroom and the Low…