Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Low frequency absorber minimum placement distance
Avatar
France
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 23, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 27, 2020 - 11:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Hi Denis,
Hi everyone,

I read and listen to a lot of videos about lower frequency absorption . And different sources seem to have contradictory statements (or at least, confusing statements).
I also noticed the depth of your ACDA absorbers is 1/16 of the minimum absorbed frequency. For example ACDA -12 has 100% absorption down to 50Hz and its depth is 16″ = (c/50Hz)/16
And Carbon Panel absorbers are even thinner. CP-10 depth is 10″ = (c/40Hz)/32

Now, I’m puzzled regarding the quarter wavelength rule and low-frequency absorber ‘s placement. So, assuming the waveform displayed in the illustration below is corresponding to the β‰ˆ95% absorbed frequency:

http://www.chicoree.fr/pub/aco…..fusion.jpg
diffusion.jpgImage Enlarger

Which of (1), (2), (3) or (4) is the correct and minimum distance between the source, the absorber , and the wall?

FWIW, I’m considering the case of a voice recording room, with a lavalier mic attached directly to the talent. So I’m mostly concerned by the sound wave that bounces back to the source position or its close neighborhood.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 99
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 4
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 10
Topics: 547
Posts: 1468

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 28
Members: 17715
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: admin, Dennis Foley