Skip to main content
search
0
Register | Lost password?
sp_Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Search

Please confirm you want to mark all posts read

Mark all topics read

sp_MobileMenu Actions
Avatar
Guest
Not logged in

New/Updated Topics

Select Forum

sp_TopicIcon
Alternative to Activated Carbon
sp_Feed
Avatar
Posts: 7
August 8, 2018 - 2:22 am

1

Hi Dennis,
I dont think i can ship your activated carbon technology to where i live because im trying to keep costs down as much as i can. since i’ll have a 25% reduction in efficieny of the BDA what density do you best recommend of mineral wool for a small room? I was planning to build up to 12 because i was planning to put M and HF absorbers on the front facing of the BDA and place it in first reflection points in my small mixng room. I have access to up to 120kg/m3 densities of rockwool. Would it be better to use denser dampening material on the inside of the BDA or should i go with something lower?

Thank you for your help

Avatar
Posts: 645
August 8, 2018 - 7:24 am
sp_UserWebsite sp_LinkedIn sp_GooglePlus

2

J, Lets get the shipping costs before we make a decision. Send me your ship to address to info@acousticfields.com and I will get a cost for you. The carbon not only increases the performance but it reduces the amount of units you need to build.

Forum Timezone:
America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 244
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 14

Devices in use: Desktop (13), Phone (1)

Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 10
Topics: 635
Posts: 1696
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 31
Members: 19474
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Close Menu