📞 Call us for a free consultation! 520–392–9486, 8am – 6pm / Log in or Sign up / Contact
logo for room acoustics forum showing a waveform within a circle and the title of the forum
Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
question about theory behing the activated carbon pellet technology
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Acoustics Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 21
Member Since:
February 15, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 22, 2017 - 1:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Hi Dennis and everyone! I have a question about the activated carbon pellet technology.
I have been reading the free eBooks (thank you Dennis!), and watching the youtube videos .

Dennis, when discussing the application of activated carbon in low frequency acoustic absorption ,
you mentioned each gram of the material has approximately 2400 square meters of surface area.
My question is – why is this surface area important?

Avatar
Chief Acoustics Engineer
Forum Posts: 387
Member Since:
August 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 22, 2017 - 5:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi Jason, I think the gram coverage might be overstated but nonetheless, carbon has a large absorption coefficient. I tried numerous combinations (12) of different thicknesses for the carbon filters but settled on the 3″ thick filter to achieve the absorption curves I desired. For The ACDA -12, I wanted everything I could get from 30 – 50 Hz. I got 30 + % at 30 Hz. , 63% @ 40 Hz. and 100 % @ 50 Hz. This is a frequency response range that produces many issues in 97 % of the small rooms in my data base. Here are test results.

I also needed a broadband absorber from 30 – 200 Hz. This was also a frequency response range found to be problematic in 95 % of our rooms in data base. The average octave coefficient is around 23 % and it is quite linear. Here are the test results: https://www.acousticfields.com…..A-12.pdf/-

These are pressure activated devices. Front walls slow energy wave, middle cabinet space area of low pressure produces pressure variance, rear/ side wall/ rigidity forces front walls to vibrate in sympathy with pressure. The carbon filters are basically a perforated absorber filled with our carbon technology which we process ourselves. With our ACDA series you have a perforated absorber inside a diaphragmatic cabinet.

Avatar
Chief Acoustics Engineer
Forum Posts: 387
Member Since:
August 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Avatar
Acoustics Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 21
Member Since:
February 15, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 23, 2017 - 10:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Excellent, thank you very much Dennis! I will be contacting you with a few other questions if I cant find the info on the site here.
Have a great day!

Jason

Avatar
Acoustics Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 21
Member Since:
February 15, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 23, 2017 - 6:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

If we do a DIY build, can we purchase off the shelf carbon pellets? I see there are options online. Is there a significant difference between your processed carbon and stuff that is in, say, fish tanks?

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 31
Currently Online:
1
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 10
Topics: 357
Posts: 991

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 23
Members: 14392
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: admin, Dennis Foley
FREE ROOM ANALYSIS
Call Us 520–392–9486
100% Money Back Guarantee