fbpx Skip to main content
Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
is 140kg/m3 Rockwool too dense for bass trapping
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
February 17, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 17, 2021 - 7:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi all,

I just had my garden studio built and the builder used Rockwool RW6 (SL9080) for insulation (keep me toasty in winter) which is a dense (and heavy) 140kg/m3.

I have a load of panels left over. I was going to use them to make 1200mmx600mm rectangle bass traps for corners, real wall and first reflection – as I had done in my previous studio (I had over two decades ago … been a while). I had always assumed the denser (as well as the deeper/thicker) was the way to go.

However, having spoken to a few commercial acoustic treatment companies their opinion is that anything over 60kg/m3 in density and bass waves won’t being able to penetrate easily and that is why they only use the 45kg/m3 in their panels.

In my old studio I seemed to get good results with the 140Kg/m3 in a room that was 11ft by 8ft by 7’6″. But then, the monitors I was using were only capable of 48hz and a SPL of only 100. My new Eve Audio 3070 are a different beast altogether – going down to 35hz and with a 120spl plus this room/shed is bigger 13ft by 10ft by 7ft.

I could just go ahead and make up the panels and “see”. But then, I won’t be able to return them unused.

So my question is …is the 150mm of the 45kg/m3 AW45 (SL9020) the way to go rather than 150mm of 140kg/m3 (all other factors like air gap being equal)?

Many thanks.

Avatar
Chief Acoustics Engineer
Forum Posts: 570
Member Since:
August 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 17, 2021 - 7:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Building insulation is not an acoustical tool to absorb low frequency energy. You are using the wrong material type and absorption technology to treat your room size/volume/usage.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 142
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 9
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 10
Topics: 562
Posts: 1504

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 28
Members: 17998
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: admin, Dennis Foley